Share
 
Mauldin & Jenkins Governmental Newsletter  |  April 2021
 
The Sun is Setting on LIBOR: Replacement of Interbank Offered Rates, the Impact on Hedge Accounting, and GASB
Statement No. 93

by Tim Lyons, CPA

What is LIBOR?
LIBOR stands for the "London Interbank Offered Rate" and is one of many interbank offered rates ("IBORs") that typically form the basis for interest rates that banks charge each other for interbank borrowing.  LIBOR is one of the most common rates, and it is also used as a benchmark interest rate for myriad other financial contracts from corporate loans to interest rate derivatives to adjustable rate mortgage loans.

Why is LIBOR being replaced and when?
LIBOR is being replaced because it no longer represents a real, functioning loan market.  In recent years, there have been multiple allegations of illegal manipulation and, as a result, regulators want to eliminate LIBOR in favor of a new reference rate that more accurately reflects the lending environment.  LIBOR is scheduled to end on December 31, 2021, but it could cease being a usable rate sooner or later depending on how alternative rates develop as well as how quickly many private sector banks stop reporting LIBOR information.  This process is referred to as "reference rate reform."

What will replace LIBOR?
The most likely replacement for financial instruments and contracts denominated in U.S. dollars is the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).  SOFR is the interest rate for overnight loans secured by U.S. Treasury securities and is quoted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.  SOFR is considered preferable to LIBOR mainly because it is based on actual transactions in one of the deepest lending markets in the world.

What does this mean for me?
As a result of reference rate reform, governments will need to amend or replace existing agreements in which variable payments made or received are dependent on an IBOR.  Many interest rate swap agreements or lease agreements include a variable rate that is based on LIBOR.  An example of a variable interest rate is "one-month LIBOR plus 0.75%."

With reference rate reform, a challenge that has arisen is that under current accounting rules (GASB Statement No. 53, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Derivative Instruments) the replacement of a reference rate in a hedging derivative instrument would mean that a government is required to terminate hedge accounting and recognize all deferred gains or losses in the period in which hedge accounting terminates.

To address this situation, the GASB issued Statement No. 93, Replacement of Interbank Offered Rates.  Statement No. 93 provides an exception to the termination provision to allow hedge accounting to continue when the reference rate of the original hedging derivative financial instrument’s variable rate is an IBOR if all of the following criteria are met:







Government Practice Leader

I am excited to see how far we have come in the past year. Vaccinations available to almost everyone, most businesses able to fully reopen, and a third major stimulus bill has been passed by Congress and signed by the President. As our economy continues to improve, and we begin to focus on returning to some level of normalcy, we want to remind you that we are here to help our clients navigate the obstacles that will be encountered by your government.

Mauldin & Jenkins remains committed to helping governmental entities with industry leading assurance and advisory services.

Please feel free to reach out to us if you have any situations that we can help with, or if there is any content or training that you would be interested in receiving more information on.

Sincerely,

~ Adam    
 
  1. The hedging derivative instrument is effective as of the end of the reporting period.
  2. The hedging derivative instrument is amended or replaced to change the reference rate of the hedging derivative instrument’s variable payment, or to add or change fallback provisions related to the reference rate.
  3. If the reference rate of the amended or replaced hedging instrument’s variable payment is multiplied by a coefficient or adjusted by addition or subtraction of a constant, the coefficient or constant is limited to what is necessary to equate the replacement rate and the original rate.
  4. If an up-front payment is made between the parties, the amount of the payment is limited to what is necessary to equate the replacement rate and the original rate.
  5. If the replacement of the reference rate is effectuated by ending the original hedging derivative instrument and entering into a replacement hedging derivative instrument, those transactions must occur on the same date.
  6. The terms that affect changes in the fair values and cash flows in the original and replacement hedging derivative instruments are identical, except for the term changes that may be necessary for the replacement of the reference rate.

Statement No. 93 also clarifies that the term changes that may be necessary for the replacement of the reference rate are limited to the following:

  1. The frequency with which the rate of the variable payment resets;
  2. The dates on which the rate resets;
  3. The methodology for resetting the rate; and
  4. The dates on which periodic payments are made.

What else is included in Statement No. 93?
Other guidance included in Statement No. 93 include up-front payments, benchmark interest rates, two-step transitions, and lease modifications.

Up-Front Payments
If an up-front payment is made to equate the replacement rate and the original rate, that payment should be reported as an asset (for payment made) or a liability (for a payment received) and amortized using the interest method over the duration of the related hedging derivative instrument.

Benchmark Interest Rates
Statement No. 93 also amends Statement No. 53 to define the term "reference rate" and to remove LIBOR as an appropriate benchmark interest rate.  Under the amended guidance in Statement No. 93, the following rates are deemed appropriate benchmark interest rates for derivative instruments:

  1. Interest rate on direct Treasury obligations of the U.S. government;
  2. Effective Federal Funds Rate; and
  3. Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).

Two-Step Transitions
Governments may choose to transition from an IBOR to an interim reference rate before it transitions to a SOFR when liquidity in the SOFR market grows.  Hedge accounting should continue to be applied in the two-step transition if certain criteria are met.

Lease Modifications
Under GASB Statement No. 87, a government is required to apply the provisions for lease modifications – including remeasurement of the lease liability or lease receivable – when the rate in a contract with variable lease payments is replaced.  Statement No. 93 simplifies the accounting analysis for lease modifications affected by reference rate reform by adding the following exception to Statement No. 87: "If variable payments of a lease contract depend on an IBOR, an amendment of the contract solely to replace the IBOR with another rate – that’s adjusted, if necessary, to essentially equate the replacement rate and the original rate – by either changing the rate or adding or changing fallback provisions related to the rate, isn’t a lease modification."

When is all of this effective?
The requirements of Statement No. 93, except for paragraphs 11b, 13 and 14, are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2020.  The requirement in paragraph 11b (dealing with LIBOR as an appropriate benchmark interest rate) is effective for reporting periods ending after December 31, 2021.  And finally, the requirements in paragraphs 13 and 14 (lease modifications) are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2021.

 
 
TEAM SPOTLIGHT
 

EXPERTISE


Financial Reporting


Federal Awards Compliance



Internal Controls

Ryan Jones, Senior Manager

Ryan W. Jones, CPA, is a Senior Manager with Mauldin & Jenkins. He graduated from the University of New Mexico in 2009 with a B.B.A. in Business Management with a concentration in Accounting. Upon
graduating, he joined a regional firm located in Albuquerque, New Mexico, his hometown. Ryan relocated to the Atlanta area in September of 2020, bringing with him eleven years of public accounting experience serving state and local governments, state agencies, not-for-profit organizations, and private enterprises. Part of what brought him across the country to Georgia was the opportunity to work exclusively in the government sector.

Ryan is a member of the American Institute of CPAs and the Georgia Society of CPAs. Prior to leaving New Mexico, he served as a finance committee member and treasurer of the Greater Albuquerque Habitat for Humanity. Through his previous firm and the New Mexico Society of CPAs, he worked with students at the University of New Mexico to inform them about the public accounting profession through a mentorship program.

Ryan and his wife, Cassandra, live in Acworth with their two daughters, Ainsley and Rylee. They recently welcomed to their family Remington (Remy), a pointer pup who has proven more challenging than either of the two children.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assurance, tax, and advisory offered through Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC.
This advertisement was sent by Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC.
Mauldin & Jenkins, 200 Galleria Parkway, Suite 1700, Atlanta, Georgia 30339, United States
 


Email Marketing by ActiveCampaign